CHEM 548: Materials Chemistry
Lecture 9: Solid Solutions and Vegard's Law
Wed 09/23/2026
Solid solutions, Vegard's law and its deviations, and band-gap engineering
Reading: Woodward, Karen, Evans, and Vogt, Solid State Materials Chemistry Ch. 2 §2.5 · Ch. 4 §§4.1–4.2
Today is Lecture 9: solid solutions and Vegard's law.
Reading : Chapter 2, section 2.5, and Chapter 4, sections 4.1 and 4.2, in Woodward, Karen, Evans, and Vogt
Objective 1 : define a solid solution — a homogeneous crystal spanning the compositions between two end members
Objective 2 : use the linear relation of Vegard's law to connect lattice parameter and band gap to composition
We start with what a solid solution is.
Solid Solutions and Vegard's Law
Solid solution Define a solid solution and compare it to a liquid solution.
Vegard's law Unit cell dimensions (and some properties) vary linearly with composition.
Apply it Calculate lattice parameters and band gaps of intermediate compositions.
Deviations Charge transfer (Mn3+ /Ru5+ in Ca-based perovskites), and ordering of different-size ions into more efficient packing.
Semiconductors Solid solutions matter in semiconductors: epitaxy, heterojunction lasers, LEDs.
Composition from measurement Estimate composition from a property measurement such as a lattice constant or a band gap.
Let's finish our brief foray into the world of point defects by talking about a concept that is quite simple yet also very powerful for certain applications.
Today: solid solutions — I'll say in a minute what I mean by one
And something called Vegard's law
So let's start with the definition of a solid solution and the AlAs and GaAs example that shows the linear behavior.
Vegard's Law
The unit cell parameters (and unit cell volume) vary linearly from one end
member to the other as a function of composition.
$a(x) = x\,a_{BX} + (1-x)\,a_{AX}$
$a(x)$ for solid solution · $a_{BX}$ for AlAs · $a_{AX}$ for GaAs
Per Solid State Materials Chemistry , Figure 2.5a, section 2.5
A solid solution is the solid-state analog of a liquid solution: just as water and ethanol mix homogeneously in any ratio, solids can form homogeneous crystals across a full composition range.
AlAs–GaAs forms a continuous solid solution
Vegard's law : the unit cell size varies linearly between the two end members
Both cubic (zinc blende) — AlAs the slightly larger lattice constant (~5.66 Å), GaAs the smaller (~5.65 Å)
Composition → lattice parameter : any value between the limits; and back again , measure the parameter and get the composition
Mathematically: the lattice constant is the weighted sum of each end member's constant — x the AlAs fraction, 1-x the GaAs fraction
That linear baseline also makes deviations from Vegard's law visible and chemically meaningful.
Deviations from Vegard's Law
Deviations from Vegard's Law can be either positive (as shown below) or negative.
Causes for deviations from Vegard's law
Site ordering Different-size ions order onto distinct sites.
Inhomogeneities The sample is not a single homogeneous phase.
Changes in oxidation state Charge transfer between the two cations.
Per Solid State Materials Chemistry , Figure 2.5b, section 2.5
Not all solid solutions obey Vegard’s law, and the author’s thesis advisor noted that Vegard himself doubted its validity.
Ironically, the linear case now bears his name
Example: solid solutions between CaRuO₃ (Ru⁴⁺) and CaMnO₃ (Mn⁴⁺)
Middle compositions: the lattice parameter curve shows a positive deviation , bowing upward
Spectroscopy reveals charge transfer : Mn³⁺ and Ru⁵⁺ appear, average ionic size larger than Mn⁴⁺ and Ru⁴⁺ — hence the expansion
Negative deviations : differently sized ions reorder into tighter packing, lattice contracts below the line
The same linear interpolation can describe an electronic property, not only a lattice dimension.
Band Gap Engineering
For semiconductors it is not unusual that the band gap will follow Vegard's law.
0.0
0.5
1.0
CdS
CdSe
Eg (eV)
1.5
2.0
2.5
CdS (Eg = 2.4 eV)
CdSe (Eg = 1.7 eV)
$E_g(x) = x E_g(\mathrm{B}) + (1-x) E_g(\mathrm{A})$
$x = \dfrac{E_g(x) - E_g(\mathrm{A})}{E_g(\mathrm{B}) - E_g(\mathrm{A})}$
Lattice constants can vary linearly with composition, and so can other properties, in which case they are said to obey Vegard’s law.
Best-known example: the band gap of semiconductors — not universally true, but many are nearly linear in composition
The mathematics mirrors the lattice parameter case : the intermediate band gap is the weighted sum of the end members' band gaps
CdS–CdSe : predict the band gap from a composition, or read the composition off a measured band gap
That combination of structural matching and tunable band gap is why solid solutions matter in devices.
Semiconductor Solid Solutions
5.5
6.0
6.5
Lattice parameter (Å)
0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
Band gap energy (eV)
0
5
10
15
20
Lattice mismatch to silicon (%)
0.4
0.5
0.7
1.0
1.5
2.0
5.0
Wavelength (µm)
Si
Ge
ZnS
ZnSe
CdS
ZnTe
CdTe
HgTe
AlP
GaP
AlAs
GaAs
InP
InAs
AlSb
GaSb
InSb
Direct gap
Indirect gap
III–V
II–VI
Group IV
Top ohmic contact
p+ GaAs contact layer
p+ AlGaAs
p GaAs active layer
n+ AlGaAs
n+ GaAs
Bottom ohmic contact
Heterojunction laser
The solid solution between GaAs ($E_g$ = 1.4 eV, $a$ = 5.65 Å) and AlAs
($E_g$ = 2.1 eV, $a$ = 5.66 Å) is among the most important for optoelectronic devices.
Adapted from P. Bhattacharya, Semiconductor Optoelectronic Devices ; alloy curves after Vurgaftman et al. (2001)
In semiconductor devices, solid solutions are critical because many involve epitaxial thin films, a crystal layer grown on a substrate with bonds matched at the interface.
Lattice constants of adjacent layers closely matched to minimize strain; band gaps must differ to achieve the function, as in heterojunction lasers
GaAs–AlAs especially useful: lattice parameters nearly identical, so epitaxial growth works across the full range
Band gap tunable from ~2.1 eV (AlAs) to ~1.4 eV (GaAs)
That tunability underpins many LEDs and lasers , where compositions with direct band gaps are essential
Semiconductors highlight Vegard's law, but the principle applies broadly to other solid solutions
One familiar non-device application makes this continuous tuning visible as a continuous change in color.
CdS-CdSe Solid Solutions
CdS1-x Sex solid solutions are excellent pigments (cadmium
yellow, cadmium orange). By controlling the composition, we can control the band gap and hence the color.
CdS ($E_g$ = 2.4 eV)
CdS1-x Sex compositions
CdSe ($E_g$ = 1.7 eV)
Cadmium pigments
As a final example, CdS–CdSe solid solutions have long been used as pigments.
Color varies continuously with composition — yellow (CdS, slightly brighter than cheddar cheese) to orange, red, and nearly black (CdSe-rich)
Cadmium pigments have declined on toxicity concerns
Still they show Vegard's law in practice: tune composition, design a pigment of any color , such as orange at an intermediate band gap
We can now use the band-gap relation to calculate the composition that gives an orange pigment.
Example: Orange CdS-CdSe
What composition in the CdS1-x Sex solid solution
will have a band gap of 2.25 eV?
CdS ($E_g$ = 2.4 eV)
CdSe ($E_g$ = 1.7 eV)
What composition in the CdS1-x Sex solid solution
will have a band gap of 2.25 eV?
CdS ($E_g$ = 2.4 eV)
CdSe ($E_g$ = 1.7 eV)
$x = \dfrac{E_g(x) - E_g(\mathrm{A})}{E_g(\mathrm{B}) - E_g(\mathrm{A})}$
What composition in the CdS1-x Sex solid solution
will have a band gap of 2.25 eV?
CdS ($E_g$ = 2.4 eV)
CdSe ($E_g$ = 1.7 eV)
$x = \dfrac{E_g(x) - E_g(\mathrm{A})}{E_g(\mathrm{B}) - E_g(\mathrm{A})}$
$x = \dfrac{2.25 - 2.40}{1.70 - 2.40} = 0.21$
What composition in the CdS1-x Sex solid solution
will have a band gap of 2.25 eV?
CdS ($E_g$ = 2.4 eV)
CdSe ($E_g$ = 1.7 eV)
$x = \dfrac{E_g(x) - E_g(\mathrm{A})}{E_g(\mathrm{B}) - E_g(\mathrm{A})}$
$x = \dfrac{2.25 - 2.40}{1.70 - 2.40} = 0.21$
CdS0.79 Se0.21
0.0
0.5
1.0
CdS
CdSe
Eg (eV)
1.5
2.0
2.5
CdS (Eg = 2.4 eV)
CdSe (Eg = 1.7 eV)
2.25 eV
So I would say the ideal band gap for making orange is something pretty close to 2.25.
Which composition of CdS1-x Sex has a band gap of 2.25 eV?
Let's write the equation that gives us x.
[advance: show the inverse equation]
Okay, to get the value of x here all we really have to do are to plug in the band gaps for the end members.
a = CdS , band gap 2.4; b = CdSe , band gap 1.7
Target : the intermediate composition at 2.25
Now let's put those three numbers into the equation.
[advance: plug in the two band gaps]
So when you plug that all into the formula you get 0.21.
The way we've set this up, that 0.21 is the selenium content
CdS0.79 Se0.21 should land very close to 2.25 — provided Vegard's law is followed
Let's write that composition down and find the point on the band-gap graph.
[advance: name the composition, and mark it on the band-gap graph]
A graph assuming perfect Vegard’s law shows that x = 0.21 corresponds to a band gap of 2.25 eV.
Easy to confuse whether 0.21 is Se or S — the reality check settles it
2.25 eV is much closer to CdS (2.4) than CdSe (1.7), so the composition must be S-rich
Confirms CdS0.79 Se0.21
That calculation brings the main ideas together before we summarize what solid solutions let us predict.
Summary
Vegard's law lets us predict composition from structure or property measurements.
Solid solutions Homogeneous crystals spanning the compositions between two end members
Vegard's law The lattice constant, and sometimes other properties, varies linearly with composition
Deviations Charge transfer or cation/anion ordering, giving positive or negative curvature
Semiconductor properties The band gap also approximates Vegard's law, which is what makes band gap engineering possible
GaAs–AlAs Nearly constant lattice parameter but tunable band gap, the key to epitaxial devices such as lasers and LEDs
CdS–CdSe Tunable band gap controls the pigment color, yellow to red to black
To summarize this lecture: solid solutions are homogeneous crystals that span compositions between two end members.
Vegard's law : the lattice constant, and sometimes other properties, varies linearly with composition
Deviations : charge transfer, or ordering of cations and anions — positive or negative curvature
Many semiconductor properties, the band gap above all, also approximate Vegard's law — that is band gap engineering
GaAs and AlAs : nearly constant lattice parameter while the band gap is tuned, key for epitaxial lasers and LEDs
CdS and CdSe : a tunable band gap controls pigment color from yellow through red to black
Take away : Vegard's law lets us predict composition from structure or from property measurements
The second half of today is phase diagrams.
Why phase diagrams
Gibbs phase rule Explain it and apply it to one- and two-component systems.
Phase diagrams Interpret diagrams with no compound formation, the eutectic-type systems.
Key regions Distinguish the liquidus, the solidus, the eutectic point, and the miscibility gap.
Lever rule Calculate phase fractions in the two-phase regions.
Real systems Recognize eutectic and solid-solution examples: diopside–anorthite, forsterite–fayalite, MgO–CaO.
Next we turn to phase diagrams, which are the tools we use to plan the synthesis of a solid-state material.
Know the phase diagram and we can pick a temperature that gives the phase we want, or conditions that grow a single crystal
State the Gibbs phase rule , apply it to one-component and two-component systems
Read a binary phase diagram for a system that forms no compounds
Tell the liquidus , solidus , eutectic point and miscibility gap apart
Use the lever rule for phase fractions in a two-phase region
Real systems : diopside and anorthite, forsterite and fayalite, magnesium oxide and calcium oxide
First we need the rule that tells us how many phases a system can hold at equilibrium, the Gibbs phase rule.
The Gibbs phase rule
$F = C + 2 - P$
$F$ degrees of freedom: variables we can change without a phase appearing or disappearing (temperature, pressure, composition of each phase)
$C$ minimum number of independent species (elements or compounds) needed to express every phase’s composition. Water: H2 O (C = 1). MgO–CaO: MgO, CaO (C = 2). Cu/Cu2 O/O2 (g): Cu, O2 (C = 2).
$P$ number of phases
For condensed phase systems where the pressure is constant this reduces to
$F = C + 1 - P$
For more details: Gibbs Phase Rule for Material Science (LearnChemE)
So let's start with the Gibbs phase rule, which is stated here.
Degree of freedom : a variable we can change on its own without a phase appearing or disappearing
The variables: temperature, pressure, composition of each phase
F = C + 2 − P — C components, P phases
Components : smallest set of independent species, elements or compounds, that expresses every phase’s composition — H2 O; MgO and CaO; Cu and O2
In this class, almost always condensed phases , so hold the pressure at one atmosphere
Then F = C + 1 − P , counting the phases present at equilibrium
Let's apply it first to the phase diagram everyone has already seen, water.
One component: water
Per Solid State Materials Chemistry , Figure 4.1, section 4.1
Water is a one-component system, so the phase rule gives us C plus two minus P, which is three minus P.
F can never be negative , so no point on this diagram holds more than three phases at equilibrium
Triple point : P = 3, F = 0 — any change in pressure or temperature takes us off that point
Single-phase region , solid ice say: P = 1, F = 2 — vary pressure and temperature independently and still have ice
Phase boundary , the ice–water melting line: P = 2, F = 1 — change the pressure and the temperature has to follow in a defined way
Now let's take that framework to a condensed system with more than one component.
A binary diagram: the axes
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
A
B
mole fraction B, xB →
Temperature
Liquid
A + Liquid
B + Liquid
A + B
Per Solid State Materials Chemistry , Figure 4.2, section 4.2.1
Now let's look at one of the simplest binary phase diagrams.
Two components, A and B — elements, copper and palladium say, or compounds, calcium oxide and magnesium oxide
Composition along x, pure A on the left to pure B on the right
Temperature up y
Pressure held at one atmosphere — let it vary too and we would need a three-dimensional diagram
The question we want to answer is how many phases we have in each region of this diagram, and the phase rule answers it.
Binary system with no compounds or solid solutions
$F = C + 1 - P$
$F = 3 - P$
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
A
B
mole fraction B, xB →
Temperature
Liquid
A + Liquid
B + Liquid
A + B
(1 phase)
(2 phases)
(2 phases)
(2 phases)
With two components the phase rule gives us degrees of freedom equal to three minus P.
F cannot be negative , so no region holds more than two phases and no point more than three
Let's count the phases field by field.
[advance: label each field with the number of phases it holds]
The shaded region at the top is liquid, and it is a single phase.
Below it on the left, solid A with liquid , two phases; on the right, solid B with liquid , two again
At the bottom, below the horizontal line, solid A with solid B , two phases
Every field holds one phase or two , exactly as the phase rule requires
Next we name those fields and the one special point where three phases meet.
Liquid, two-phase fields, eutectic point
$F = C + 1 - P$
$F = 3 - P$
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
A
B
mole fraction B, xB →
Temperature
Liquid
(1 phase)
F = 2
A + Liquid
(2 phases)
F = 1
B + Liquid
(2 phases)
F = 1
A + B
(2 phases)
F = 1
F = 0
Eutectic point
(3 phases)
At high temperature the gray region is a homogeneous liquid, where we can vary composition and temperature and still have a single phase, so this region has two degrees of freedom.
One phase, so the liquid's composition is the overall composition
The three other regions: two phases coexist — solid A with solid B below the horizontal line, or a solid with liquid above it
Two phases: F = 1 — choose the temperature and each phase's composition is fixed
One special point where liquid, solid A and solid B all coexist — the eutectic point
Three phases: F = 0 — the temperature and all three compositions are fixed
In a eutectic diagram it is also the lowest temperature at which any liquid exists , the minimum melting temperature
Let's name the two lines that bound these fields, starting with the horizontal one.
The solidus
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
A
B
mole fraction B, xB →
Temperature
Liquid
A + Liquid
B + Liquid
A + B
Solidus
This horizontal line drawn here is called the solidus, and the solidus is the highest temperature at which no liquid is present.
Below the solidus : a two-phase mixture of solids
Above the solidus : a two-phase mixture of a solid in equilibrium with the liquid
The other boundary is the curved one, the liquidus.
The liquidus, then cooling from point a
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
A
B
mole fraction B, xB →
Temperature
Liquid
A + Liquid
B + Liquid
A + B
Liquidus
a
b
Point a homogeneous liquid, A0.4 B0.6
Point b liquid A0.4 B0.6 in equilibrium with solid B
Then we have this curved line, which separates the liquid region from the rest of the phase diagram, and we call it the liquidus.
Liquidus : the curve that walls the liquid field off from everything below it
Let's pick a point up in the liquid field.
[advance: mark point a in the liquid field]
Let's take a random point on this phase diagram.
Point a , at zero point six on the x-axis — composition forty percent A, sixty percent B
High enough temperature, so it is a homogeneous liquid
Let's see what happens as we cool it down from that temperature.
[advance: cool from point a down to point b on the liquidus]
When we reach the liquidus, at point b, the liquid is in equilibrium with solid B, and the first crystals of B appear.
Point b on the liquidus : liquid plus the first crystals of B
Straight down from a , still x = 0.6 — composition does not change on cooling
A little further down is point c, inside the two-phase field.
Tie line at point c, then the lever rule
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
A
B
mole fraction B, xB →
Temperature
Liquid
A + Liquid
B + Liquid
A + B
a
b
d
c
e
Point c liquid A0.57 B0.43 in equilibrium with solid B
$F = 1$ fix T and both phase compositions are set; moving c changes only the amounts
Fraction of solid B ($f$)
$f = \dfrac{l_{dc}}{l_{de}}$
$f = \dfrac{0.6 - 0.43}{1.0 - 0.43} = 0.30$
At point c the system is in a two-phase region, solid B together with liquid, and the liquid no longer has the composition we started with.
Draw a horizontal tie line from c out to the single-phase regions on either side
Left: it meets the liquidus at point d , liquid at forty-three percent B, fifty-seven percent A
Right: out to point e , at pure B
So at c, solid B with a liquid of A 0.57, B 0.43 , while the overall composition is still sixty percent B
F = 3 − 2 = 1 : pick the temperature and both compositions are set, liquid at d, solid B at e
Overall composition is not a variable : move c along the tie line and only the amounts change
Now we want to know how much of each.
[advance: the lever rule as a ratio of segments]
And to do that we use something called the lever rule.
Look at the lengths of the segments on the line from d to e
Fraction of solid B = the segment opposite to B , d to c, over the whole line d to e
Now let's read those two lengths off the x-axis and put the numbers in.
[advance: work the numbers]
Reading off the x-axis, point c is at zero point six, so the distance from d to c is zero point six minus zero point four three, which is zero point one seven, and the full distance from d to e is one minus zero point four three, which is zero point five seven.
0.17 / 0.57 ≈ thirty percent — at c the sample is thirty percent solid B, seventy percent liquid
The opposite side of the lever makes sense at once: slide c toward d and the sample has to be almost all liquid
Check : thirty percent pure B plus seventy percent of a liquid at A 0.57 B 0.43 gives back forty percent A, sixty percent B — try that one yourself
Overall composition is conserved ; only its division between the two phases changes
Let's see this kind of diagram in a real pair of materials.
A real eutectic: diopside and anorthite
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
1250
1300
1350
1400
1450
1500
1550
Diopside
CaMgSi2 O 6
Anorthite
CaAl2 Si 2 O 8
wt % anorthite →
Temperature (°C)
P = 1 bar
Liquid
Liquid + Crystals
Liquid + Crystals
Crystals
Liquidus
Liquidus
Solidus
Eutectic
Diopside CaMgSi2 O6
Anorthite CaAl2 Si2 O8
Here is a real-life example of this kind of simple eutectic phase diagram.
The silicate minerals : our components are diopside and anorthite , minerals that turn up in lava flows
Cool on the diopside-rich side : cross the liquidus and diopside crystallizes; anorthite only once we pass the solidus
Anorthite-rich side , the opposite: anorthite first at the liquidus, diopside only past the solidus
In both of these diagrams the two solids stay separate; next we look at a system whose solids mix.
Binary system with complete solid solution formation
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
A
B
mole fraction B, xB →
Temperature
liquidus
solidus
Liquid
Solid
c
dl
ds
el
e
es
fl
fs
g
T1
T2
T3
T4
T4 sample completely melts, composition A0.35 B0.65
T3 equilibrium mixture of liquid rich in A and solid rich in B
T2 sample begins to melt
T1 homogeneous solid, composition A0.35 B0.65
Per Solid State Materials Chemistry , Figure 4.4, section 4.2.3
Now let's look at a different type of phase diagram, one where the solids form a solid solution.
A solution is a homogeneous mixture: liquids often mix that way, gases always do, and some solids do too
Silver and gold both take cubic close packing, so any ratio gives a homogeneous solid, the atoms distributed at random over the lattice
Take a sample at sixty-five percent gold and thirty-five percent silver
You might expect a single melting temperature — the behavior is richer than that
Let's heat the sample and follow it from T one up to T four.
[advance: walk the melting sequence from T one to T four]
We start at point g, at temperature T one, where the solid is homogeneous, sixty-five percent B and thirty-five percent A.
T two, point f : the sample begins to melt, but not all at once
T three, point e : two-phase equilibrium — liquid about forty-seven percent B off the liquidus, solid about eighty-three percent B off the solidus
Keep heating and the liquid fraction grows while the remaining solid gets richer in B
T four, point d : the last solid melts, homogeneous liquid again, back at sixty-five percent B and thirty-five percent A
There is a real mineral pair that behaves exactly this way.
A real solid solution: forsterite and fayalite
olivine structure
Here is a real-world example from the silicate minerals: the phase diagram between forsterite, Mg two SiO four, and fayalite, Fe two SiO four.
Same stoichiometry and same structure , the olivine structure
Spinel : cubic close packing of the oxide ions, cations in tetrahedral and octahedral holes
Olivine : the same kinds of holes, but on hexagonal close packing of the anions
Because the two match so closely , they form a complete solid solution
Hence this simple diagram, a single lens between liquidus and solidus
Not every pair of solids mixes that completely.
Partial solid solutions, lever rule at point G
Considering the coordinates of points d ($x_B$ = 0.1), g ($x_B$ = 0.3) and
h ($x_B$ = 0.95) what phases are present at g? In what ratio?
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
A
B
mole fraction B, xB →
Temperature
Liquid
Ass +
Liquid
Bss + Liquid
Ass + Bss
Ass
Bss
c
d
e
f
g
h
T1
Phases at g A0.9 B0.1 + A0.05 B0.95
Fraction of A0.05 B0.95
$f = \dfrac{l_{gd}}{l_{dh}} = \dfrac{0.30 - 0.10}{0.95 - 0.10} = 0.24$
Per Solid State Materials Chemistry , Figure 4.5, section 4.2.3
Solid solutions can also form incompletely, and then below the solidus we get two solids coexisting.
Label them A s s and B s s , solid solutions rather than pure A and pure B, and read their compositions straight off the diagram
Given : d at xB 0.1, g at 0.3, h at 0.95
Which phases at g, and in what ratio ?
Let's draw the tie line through point g and read the two phases off its ends.
[advance: draw the tie line from d through g to h]
Point g lies in a two-phase region, so we find the coexisting phases by drawing a horizontal tie line out to the single-phase regions on either side.
Left : a solid solution at x = 0.1 — ninety percent A, ten percent B
Right : a solid solution at x = 0.95 — ninety-five percent B, five percent A
Those two solid solutions are the phases at point g, and the lever rule gives us their relative amounts.
[advance: work the lever rule between d and h]
So let's work out the fraction of the sample in the phase that is rich in B, the phase we meet at point h.
That fraction = segment g to d over the whole segment d to h
0.2 / 0.85 = twenty-four percent
So twenty-four percent of the ninety-five percent B phase, seventy-six percent of the A-rich phase
A pair of real oxides shows this same partial mixing.
A real miscibility gap: MgO and CaO
20
40
60
80
1600
1800
2000
2200
2400
2600
2800
MgO
CaO
wt % CaO →
Temperature (°C)
L
MgO ss + L
CaO ss + L
MgO ss
CaO ss
MgO ss + CaO ss
Rock salt structure
Taken from: https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/materials-science-and-engineering/3-012-fundamentals-of-materials-science-fall-2005/lecture-notes/lec19t.pdf
As another real-life example, consider the phase diagram of magnesium oxide and calcium oxide.
Both adopt rock salt , so we might expect a complete solid solution
In reality a fifty-fifty mixture gives two crystalline phases : one MgO-rich with a little calcium dissolved in it, one CaO-rich with a little magnesium
The two-phase region between the two limited solid-solution fields is a miscibility gap
Like oil and water : MgO and CaO mix only slightly in the solid state, so partial miscibility, not a full solid solution
Let's pull the phase-diagram half of the lecture together.
Summary: phase diagrams
Phase diagrams are the tools for planning synthesis, growing crystals, and
reading what is at equilibrium.
Gibbs phase rule Links components, phases and degrees of freedom, and simplifies under constant pressure
Single-component diagrams Water shows the triple point, the phase boundaries, and the constraints on the degrees of freedom
Binary diagrams The liquidus and the solidus, eutectic behavior, and solid solutions
Lever rule Turns a tie line into the proportion of each phase in a two-phase region
Real materials Minerals, oxides and alloys give complete and incomplete solid solutions, and the miscibility gaps between them
To summarize the phase-diagram half of this lecture: phase diagrams are the tools we use to plan a synthesis, to grow crystals, and to understand what is at equilibrium in a solid-state system.
The Gibbs phase rule ties components, phases and degrees of freedom together, and simplifies at constant pressure
A one-component diagram like water: triple points, phase boundaries, and the limit the rule puts on the degrees of freedom
Binary diagrams : liquidus and solidus, eutectic behavior, solid solutions
The lever rule turns a tie line into the proportion of each phase in a two-phase region
Real materials , minerals, oxides and alloys: complete solid solutions, incomplete ones, and the miscibility gaps between them
The practice questions for today cover both halves of the lecture.
Practice questions
Work the Lecture 9 practice questions before the next class.
Open the Lecture 9 practice questions
Your homework is the Lecture 9 practice questions.
On the course website: chem548.wileylab.org/practice.html under the Lecture 9 anchor, or the Practice link in the nav
They cover solid solutions , Vegard's law , deviations from it, and band-gap engineering in semiconductors and pigments
Then the Gibbs phase rule , reading a binary phase diagram , the liquidus , the solidus and the eutectic point
The lever rule , and solid solutions and miscibility gaps in real materials
Work them before the next class; every question carries a worked explanation, so you can check your reasoning as you go.